Operand restriction not satisfied with *check-consistency* (Aarch64)

Eric Marsden via Sbcl-devel <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.steel-bank.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

 From random-integer testing on Aarch64 (FWIW, the same setting for 
*check-consistency* doesn't trigger errors on AMD64).

* (lisp-implementation-version)
"2.5.11.55-018143647"
* (setq sb-c::*check-consistency* t)
T
* (defun foo (a)
     (declare (type (integer -85113 750105) a))
     (sbit #*0111110010 (min 9 (max 0 a))))

debugger invoked on a SB-INT:BUG in thread
#<THREAD tid=537180 "main thread" RUNNING {1001990003}>:
     operand restriction not satisfied: #<SB-C:TN-REF
                                          :TN #<SB-C:TN t1[ZR] :COMPONENT>
                                          :WRITE-P NIL
                                          :VOP SB-VM::MOVE-IF/WORD>
   This is probably a bug in SBCL itself. (Alternatively, SBCL might 
have been
   corrupted by bad user code, e.g. by an undefined Lisp operation like
   (FMAKUNBOUND 'COMPILE), or by stray pointers from alien code or from 
unsafe
   Lisp code; or there might be a bug in the OS or hardware that SBCL is 
running
   on.) If it seems to be a bug in SBCL itself, the maintainers would 
like to
   know about it. Bug reports are welcome on the SBCL mailing lists, 
which you
   can find at <http://sbcl.sourceforge.net/>.

Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:EXIT) to exit from SBCL.

restarts (invokable by number or by possibly-abbreviated name):
   0: [ABORT] Exit debugger, returning to top level.

(SB-INT:BUG "operand restriction not satisfied: ~S" #<SB-C:TN-REF :TN 
#<SB-C:TN t1[ZR] :COMPONENT> :WRITE-P NIL :VOP SB-VM::MOVE-IF/WORD>)
0] backtrace

Backtrace for: #<SB-THREAD:THREAD tid=537180 "main thread" RUNNING 
{1001990003}>
0: (SB-INT:BUG "operand restriction not satisfied: ~S" #<SB-C:TN-REF :TN 
#<SB-C:TN t1[ZR] :COMPONENT> :WRITE-P NIL :VOP SB-VM::MOVE-IF/WORD>)
1: (SB-C::BARF "operand restriction not satisfied: ~S" #<SB-C:TN-REF :TN 
#<SB-C:TN t1[ZR] :COMPONENT> :WRITE-P NIL :VOP SB-VM::MOVE-IF/WORD>)
2: ((FLET SB-C::CHECK :IN SB-C::CHECK-PACK-CONSISTENCY) (#(NIL NIL T NIL 
#1=(17 . #2=(2)) NIL NIL #2# #3=(17) NIL NIL NIL ...) #(NIL NIL T NIL 
#1# NIL NIL #2# #3# NIL NIL NIL ..\
.)) #<SB-C:TN-REF :TN #<SB-C:TN t2[NL1] :NORMAL> :WRITE-P NIL :VOP 
SB-VM::MOVE-IF/WORD>)
3: (SB-C::CHECK-PACK-CONSISTENCY #<SB-C:COMPONENT :NAME "<unknown>" 
{1001938993}>)
4: (SB-C::%COMPILE-COMPONENT #<SB-C:COMPONENT :NAME "<unknown>" 
{1001938993}>)


_______________________________________________
Sbcl-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.