Re: [Sbcl-bugs] can't compile sbcl-2.6.1 on OpenIndiana SPARC
Sergey Fedorov <[email protected]> Fri, 6 Feb 2026 02:20:12 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.steel-bank.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALYdzyk=NtjtaH5jm1DwmM=dUrS-quQBh5mSd5xJK9aXnhkSaA@mail.gmail.com> |
On macOS powerpc it was 2-step bootstrap (as you may remember): archaic official release to 2.4.6 to the latest one. On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 5:55 AM Douglas Katzman via Sbcl-devel < [email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 3:22 PM Klaus Ziegler via Sbcl-bugs < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> Would it also be possible to make my way up the >> chain from 2.0.4 - 2.1.1 and so on... >> >> That may be possible in theory, but you're talking about stepping through > 5 years of evolution with either 1 build per release or guessing how many > months ahead you can jump before exposing a bug in the previous release. > But aside from the tedium, you may hit problems with the older C runtime. > As a quick feasibility exercise, I went on a SunOS GCC farm machine, > downloaded the prebuilt SBCL as you did, and I tried building 2.0.11 which > failed in the C compile. > I think you'll probably have an easier time using a known good (current) > aarch64 or x86-64 host and doing a cross-build. > _______________________________________________ > Sbcl-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel > _______________________________________________ Sbcl-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel