Re: SBCL dev regression testing with client code
Christophe Rhodes via Sbcl-devel <[email protected]> Sat, 14 Feb 2026 14:09:52 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.steel-bank.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think this is great. Thank you for kicking this off. Gábor Melis <[email protected]> writes: > I added a rolling "latest-dev" release to SBCL, which gets updated on > push (intended for master only). This release has various binary > distribution tarballs (produced with binary-distribution.sh). These > changes are on the publish-latest-dev branch in my SBCL fork: > > https://github.com/melisgl/sbcl/commits/publish-latest-dev/ > > This is what the latest-dev release that it creates looks like: > > https://github.com/melisgl/sbcl/releases A very minor thing: I think we should namespace this a little bit, given that other hosting services might have their own mechanisms for what we want to do here, and that this requires a tag in at least the github mirror. (I don't know if it's sensible to have a tag in the github mirror but not upstream; if so, that would also work). I know it's a bit bikesheddy, but github-latest-dev or something would constrain us less in the future. I would love to hear whether this would help any other users with testing what they're doing with tip-of-tree SBCL, or what else would be needed to make this useful. Thank you again, Christophe _______________________________________________ Sbcl-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel