Re: [Sbcl-commits] master: Potentially skip a floating-point test that might fail

It is new as much as previously there was no (* 1.0e30 1.0e30)
operation. But what messes up the sticky bits.

On Sun, Feb 22, 2026 at 6:00 AM Douglas Katzman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> All I know is that it looks new for this month and I don't have the means to delve into it.
>
> ::: Running :FTRUNCATE-INLINE
>
> ::: Success :FTRUNCATE-INLINE
>
> ::: Running :CTYPE-OF-NAN
>
> ::: Success :CTYPE-OF-NAN
>
> ::: Running :FLOAT-TYPE-DERIVATION
>
> ::: Success :FLOAT-TYPE-DERIVATION
>
> ::: Running :COMPARISON-TRANSFORM-OVERFLOW
>
> ::: UNEXPECTED-FAILURE :COMPARISON-TRANSFORM-OVERFLOW due to DIVISION-BY-ZERO:
>
>         "arithmetic error DIVISION-BY-ZERO signalled
>
> Operation was (* 1.0e30 1.0e30)."
>
> ::: Running :COMPARISON-MERGING
>
> ::: Success :COMPARISON-MERGING


_______________________________________________
Sbcl-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel