Re: Common Lisp with no AI (that's ironic I suppose)

On 26 Feb 2026, at 23:51, Brett Mahar wrote:

> One thing that I think has been overlooked in the recent "should AI be allowed?" thread was: how about the copyright? How can the "author" grant copyright when they did not write the code? I'm not a lawyer but from what I understand the answer is "they can't" and Microsoft or Google or whoever can issue an injunction at any moment, or 10 years down the track when 5000 more commits have been done on top of the work of various agents and humans.

Do you have a source for this claim?