Re: Common Lisp with no AI (that's ironic I suppose)

"Scott L. Burson" <[email protected]> writes:

>  Unfortunately [...] the quality of error is
>  different in generic LLM output for a prompt or scenario compared with
>  generic, or even expert, human for a similar scenario.  In particular,
>  with humans errors tend to be correlated -- a person not paying
>  attention to a particular aspect of a problem is also, all other things
>  being equal, more likely to leave typos in, fail to use technical terms
>  correctly, and so on.  These markers of poor attention to detail are
>  essentially absent, or so different as to 
>
> Can I tease you a little about forgetting to end a sentence whose
> subject was attention to detail?  :-) :-)

Well, I'm only human.

Christophe