Re: SBCL Fibers proposal

On 3/12/26 18:25, Charles Zhang via Sbcl-devel wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Anthony,
> 
> My notes aren't as detailed as Christophe's review, but I did spend 
> enough time looking at your proposal that I think I should share them 
> anyway. tl;dr is I think dynamic binding needs to be redesigned/ 
> rewritten and please start adding citations to the claims to make this 
> easier to review and allow us to have more time to help you fix the sbcl 
> parts you're not sure about rather than spending time to refute the llm 
> on things it says verbosely that are totally wrong. org file is pasted 
> inline in this email.
> 

are fibers like coroutines. I remeber franz acl used to have an 
implementation before hardware threads where common place? I believe the 
coroutines can be stack allocated.  anyone remember or have a link?