Re: SBCL Fibers proposal
Robert Goldman <[email protected]> Thu, 12 Mar 2026 19:12:49 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.steel-bank.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Allegro definitely has had green threads. They may still, because they have two versions of their system, one that I think has only green threads and one that has full SMP support. On 12 Mar 2026, at 18:43, steve gonedes wrote: > On 3/12/26 18:25, Charles Zhang via Sbcl-devel wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Anthony, >> >> My notes aren't as detailed as Christophe's review, but I did spend >> enough time looking at your proposal that I think I should share them >> anyway. tl;dr is I think dynamic binding needs to be redesigned/ >> rewritten and please start adding citations to the claims to make >> this easier to review and allow us to have more time to help you fix >> the sbcl parts you're not sure about rather than spending time to >> refute the llm on things it says verbosely that are totally wrong. >> org file is pasted inline in this email. >> > > are fibers like coroutines. I remeber franz acl used to have an > implementation before hardware threads where common place? I believe > the coroutines can be stack allocated. anyone remember or have a > link? > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sbcl-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel _______________________________________________ Sbcl-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel