Re: SBCL Fibers proposal

Robert Goldman <[email protected]> Thu, 12 Mar 2026 19:12:49 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.steel-bank.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Allegro definitely has had green threads.  They may still, because they 
have two versions of their system, one that I think has only green 
threads and one that has full SMP support.

On 12 Mar 2026, at 18:43, steve gonedes wrote:

> On 3/12/26 18:25, Charles Zhang via Sbcl-devel wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Anthony,
>>
>> My notes aren't as detailed as Christophe's review, but I did spend 
>> enough time looking at your proposal that I think I should share them 
>> anyway. tl;dr is I think dynamic binding needs to be redesigned/ 
>> rewritten and please start adding citations to the claims to make 
>> this easier to review and allow us to have more time to help you fix 
>> the sbcl parts you're not sure about rather than spending time to 
>> refute the llm on things it says verbosely that are totally wrong. 
>> org file is pasted inline in this email.
>>
>
> are fibers like coroutines. I remeber franz acl used to have an 
> implementation before hardware threads where common place? I believe 
> the coroutines can be stack allocated.  anyone remember or have a 
> link?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sbcl-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel

_______________________________________________
Sbcl-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel