Re: [PATCH] Handle missing __suseconds64_t

I see that it is a problem, but this is not the best solution.
sb-grovel needs to properly handle struct timeval.

On Sat, Mar 28, 2026 at 11:27 AM Masatoshi SANO <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I noticed the build was failing on musl x86 due to missing __suseconds64_t. The attached patch adds an os-provides-suseconds64-t feature flag and falls back to suseconds_t when the type is missing.
>
> BTW, are there any non-win32 platforms still in use that lack suseconds_t entirely? If not, the #-os-provides-suseconds-t "long" fallback might be dead code at this point.
>
> CI results for reference:
> - Before (failing): https://github.com/roswell/sbcl_head/actions/runs/23646018362
> - After (passing): https://github.com/roswell/sbcl_head/actions/runs/23664212234
> _______________________________________________
> Sbcl-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel


_______________________________________________
Sbcl-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel