Re: Bug in vop code

Of course, I was so focused on the SBCL side that I didn't think of
those constraints of x86. I'll add logic to MOV the number and then add
if it's larger than 32 bits.

On 4/2/24 5:58 PM, Douglas Katzman wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 7:30 PM Andrew Sengul <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi everyone, I'm running into some bugs with vop code. I'm
>     attempting to
>     add an integer to a quadword register but I get an error message
>     informing me that the integer is too big to fit into 32 bits.
>
>  
> amd64 accepts immediate operands larger than (signed-byte 32) only in
> MOV instructions.
> You have to respect all architectural constraints. Try calling
> CONSTANTIZE which will work fine unless you have two memory operands.


_______________________________________________
Sbcl-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-help