Re: SBCL 2.3.11: Core dump after typing Control-4
Richard M Kreuter via Sbcl-help <[email protected]> Wed, 25 Jun 2025 09:22:45 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.steel-bank.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Would there be much downside letting users do the equivalent of signal(SIGQUIT, SIG_IGN); ? And likewise for SIGHUP, SIGUSR1, SIGUSR2. And while I'm asking, how about letting users do signal(SIGINT, SIG_DFL); for cases where you don't want SBCL's SIGINT handler? Note that I'm only thinking about the two handlers defined in the C standard, not arbitrary user-defined ones. Thanks, Richard