Re: missing methods

On 4/2/26 4:46 AM, Christophe Rhodes wrote:
> What I suspect instead is that something is not quite as you describe it: something like a misspelling of some name, *package* not being what you expect (or the package later having its structure changed), some symbol not being CL:<symbol> but something else...
The source file contains many other forms that are compiled correctly. 
If after loading the system, I open the source file in Emacs and do 
slime-compile-defun on the one offending form, it miraculously starts 
working.

There is nothing funny with packages going on, redefinition of the form, 
or anything like that. I looked for all those kinds of things right off 
the bat. I actually commented out almost all of the entire system 
subsequent to the offending form. I'll see if I can create a more 
"minimal" version to replicate the problem, but it won't be the simplest 
case because that doesn't fail.

I was really hoping it was a known bug or that I was an idiot.