Re: UFFI cormanlisp support

Great, Reini!

I'm looking forward to working with you to complete Corman support
in UFFI! I'm traveling now, but I'll write directly to you to discuss
Corman support.  

-- 
Kevin Rosenberg
kevin-HJRc7zDS/[email protected]


On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Reini Urban wrote:

> my first start. not tested yet, just written. more later this week.
> missing are the strings, aggregates and testing. not a big deal at all.
> CLISP is probably the worst case to support.
> 
> some notes:
>   we need the :pascal (:stdcall) calling conventions for 
>   (def-function names args &key module returning calling-convention)
>   so I added this. calling-convention defaults to :cdecl
>   but on win32 we mostly use :stdcall
> 
>   #+corman is invalid, #+cormanlisp instead
> 
>   cormanlisp doesn't need to load and register the dll, since the underlying 
>   LoadLibrary() call does this. we need the module keyword for def-function
> instead.
>   (should probably default to kernel32.dll)
>   I'll think about library.cl, but we'll need more real-world win32 examples. 
>   (ideally the complete winapi :)
>   I also have to look at valentina.
> 
> patch -p0 < corman.diff
>