Re: (convert-from-uffi-type ... :struct) under mcl

Marco Baringer wrote:
> the second form isn't a valid openmcl ffi typespec and the first form
> errors on sbcl.  is this a bug (then i'll go ahead and fix it) or am i
> just missing something?

The first form is invalid uffi syntax. The second is correct.

> just out of curiosity, since there will never be no c type named "*",
> why is CL:* used and not :*?

It's what allegro uses.

I don't currently have a powerpc box for testing on openmcl. But, I'll
accept patches as long as the test suite runs as well on openmcl as it
currently does.

-- 
Kevin Rosenberg
kevin-HJRc7zDS/[email protected]