Re: State of function pointers

Ben <ben-PLN1j/[email protected]> Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:04:56 -0500 (EST)
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.uffi.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
greg --

i wrote a sleepycat interface (to 4.2) using uffi for elephant.  it is
separate from the rest of the stuff and easy to take out.  it should
also be easy to upgrade to 4.3.

http://www.common-lisp.net/project/elephant

i didn't use function pointers, there's a little C code to make
everything happy.  function pointers aren't well supported by all
lisps, most notably allegro.

B

> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 20:04:48 -0800
> From: Greg Pfeil <[email protected]>
> Subject: [UFFI-Devel] State of Function Pointers
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <e874d8c617ace55735e97a1d69b27f77-5OrCvuw2K9kVHX+GpEBEIg@public.gmane.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> Is anyone working on anything involving function pointers in UFFI? I
> was working on a Berkeley DB interface in UFFI and hacked in a bit of
> function-pointer stuff just so I didn't have to mix UFFI-style types
> with OpenMCL-style types.
>
> I'd be happy to submit it as a patch or something as a starting point
> for non-MCL support or whatever. I mean, it's basically a copy of
> def-function, that takes a pointer instead of a name ... and no module.
>
> Anyone? Bueller?
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> UFFI-Devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.b9.com/mailman/listinfo/uffi-devel
>
>
> End of UFFI-Devel Digest, Vol 6, Issue 2
> ****************************************
>