Re: Coercing pointers
Kevin Rosenberg <kevin-HJRc7zDS/[email protected]> Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:08:53 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.uffi.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Edi Weitz wrote: > > Do LW not have an :unsigned-char type? > They have but it behaves like a number, don't know why: I suppose their justification is their is no concept of an unsigned character in lisp. > If you'd modify ENSURE-CHAR-CHARACTER for this case it had to make a > runtime decision which probably wouldn't be a good idea. Hmm, what's so bad about #+lispworks (defmacro ensure-char-character (obj) `(if (characterp ,obj) ,obj (code-char ,obj))) Just the run-time overhead? I think that I'm happy enough with this on Lispworks as I don't know of a better way to regularize their difference of dereferencing a :char and :unsigned-char. We can still add the deref-char-pointer to provide an optimized dereferencing returning a lisp character. --=20 Kevin Rosenberg kevin-HJRc7zDS/[email protected] --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/O9A1ES7N8sSjgj4RAr/RAJ4gmQpaoVXMMJO73mOTpk382NifLwCeKL3I G9Q+IsavxBsumAi/eMy0lGI= =3ESG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO--