Re: How to define callback functions

Mhh, after all it looks most portable to use UFFI as long as possible
and the switch to implementation dependant variants.
Thanks for your help
regards
AHz

 >-----Original Message-----
 >From: Edi Weitz [mailto:[email protected]]
 >Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 3:20 PM
 >To: Mario Mommer
 >Cc: Andreas Hinze; [email protected]
 >Subject: Re: [UFFI-Users] How to define callback functions
 >
 >
 >On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:07:03 +0100, Mario Mommer
 ><[email protected]> wrote:
 >
 >> Oh, there are easier ways. See
 >>
 >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.cmucl.devel/2472
 >
 >Argh! I read it but forgot about it, sorry. (Well, at least I can
 >defend myself by noting that it doesn't work "out-of-the-box" with a
 >released CMUCL. But that will most likely change.)
 >
 >> In
 >>
 >> http://www.caddr.com/macho/archives/clump/2003-12/360.html
 >>
 >> D. Didieren mentions how to make this work with SBCL. The
 >> attachments, however, have been stripped. If you are interested, I
 >> can send you a copy.
 >
 >Yes, please.
 >
 >Thanks,
 >Edi.
 >