Re: GCL (and clisp)
Marco Antoniotti <[email protected]> Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:40:05 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.uffi.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> X-Authentication-Warning: boa.b9.com: kevin owned process doing -bs > From: Kevin Rosenberg <kevin-HJRc7zDS/[email protected]> > X-X-Sender: [email protected] > cc: [email protected] > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > Sender: [email protected] > X-BeenThere: [email protected] > X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 > Precedence: bulk > List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.b9.com/mailman/listinfo/uffi-users>, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > List-Id: UFFI Users' List <uffi-users.b9.com> > List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]> > List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help> > List-Subscribe: <http://www.b9.com/mailman/listinfo/uffi-users>, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe> > List-Archive: <http://www.b9.com/pipermail/uffi-users/> > Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 13:08:06 -0700 (MST) > Content-Length: 582 > > > Future releases of Maxima will be fully supported on at least CMUCL, > > clisp and GCL. clisp has already come up on this list. Has anyone > > thought about GCL? I am not in a position to work on GCL support myself > > at this point, but I could try to find someone who is. > > No, I hadn't thought about GCL. If you know someone who would like to work > on this, please get him or her in contact with me and we can discuss > adding GCL support. What is the status of ANSI compliance in GCL? Wouldn't ECL be a better candidate right now as a KCL derivative tu support? Cheers -- Marco Antoniotti ======================================================== NYU Courant Bioinformatics Group tel. +1 - 212 - 998 3488 719 Broadway 12th Floor fax +1 - 212 - 995 4122 New York, NY 10003, USA http://bioinformatics.cat.nyu.edu "Hello New York! We'll do what we can!" Bill Murray in `Ghostbusters'.