Re: GCL (and clisp)

Marco Antoniotti <[email protected]> Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:40:05 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.uffi.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> X-Authentication-Warning: boa.b9.com: kevin owned process doing -bs
> From: Kevin Rosenberg <kevin-HJRc7zDS/[email protected]>
> X-X-Sender: [email protected]
> cc: [email protected]
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> Sender: [email protected]
> X-BeenThere: [email protected]
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8
> Precedence: bulk
> List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.b9.com/mailman/listinfo/uffi-users>,
> 	<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
> List-Id: UFFI Users' List <uffi-users.b9.com>
> List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
> List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
> List-Subscribe: <http://www.b9.com/mailman/listinfo/uffi-users>,
> 	<mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
> List-Archive: <http://www.b9.com/pipermail/uffi-users/>
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 13:08:06 -0700 (MST)
> Content-Length: 582
> 
> > Future releases of Maxima will be fully supported on at least CMUCL,
> > clisp and GCL. clisp has already come up on this list. Has anyone
> > thought about GCL? I am not in a position to work on GCL support myself
> > at this point, but I could try to find someone who is.
> 
> No, I hadn't thought about GCL. If you know someone who would like to work 
> on this, please get him or her in contact with me and we can discuss 
> adding GCL support.

What is the status of ANSI compliance in GCL?  Wouldn't ECL be a
better candidate right now as a KCL derivative tu support?

Cheers

-- 
Marco Antoniotti ========================================================
NYU Courant Bioinformatics Group        tel. +1 - 212 - 998 3488
719 Broadway 12th Floor                 fax  +1 - 212 - 995 4122
New York, NY 10003, USA                 http://bioinformatics.cat.nyu.edu
                    "Hello New York! We'll do what we can!"
                           Bill Murray in `Ghostbusters'.