Re: Re: [CLSQL-Help] CLSQL-USQL

On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 08:08:42PM +0200, Edi Weitz wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 11:43:49 -0600, Kevin Rosenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > I notice loop-extension.lisp is included. To the degree that
> > CLSQL-USQL migh strive for cross-implementation compatibility, using
> > such loop extensions in an application would be counter-productive.
> 
> Why? It would work on some implementations while it wouldn't work on
> others. The same is true for parts of UFFI or various other
> cross-implementation libraries.
> 
> I personally think that the loop extensions are nice to have. Given
> SBCL's relation to CMUCL it shouldn't be too hard to make the
> extensions available there. 

Oh, _that's_ nice to hear ;-) I just stumbled over the missing loop
extension in UncommonSQL -- unfortunately i'm no SBCL expert, it looks
like SBCL's loop code doesn't export the loop extension stuff.


Ralf Mattes

> Also, there is my code (which I myself got
> from Xanalys support) for a LispWorks loop extension in Paul Foley's
> BerkeleyDB package. This could be used as a basis for LW. So we'd have
> four implementation covered already.
> 
> Cheers,
> Edi.
> _______________________________________________
> usql-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.onshored.com/mailman/listinfo/usql-list