Re: Iteration syntax for UncommonSQL

To provide an update to this: I recently updated my CVS version of
UncommonSQL and it _looks_ like they also support DO-QUERY for view
class objects now. I can't verify this because the current version
didn't build for me and at the moment I don't have the time to dig
around in the sources until it does.

However, it also seems that the implementation of DO-QUERY does
exactly what I originally wanted to avoid: It first stores the
complete result of the query and then uses an iteration construct (DO
in this case) to walk through it. I think/hope that the original
CommonSQL doesn't do this.

(Please note that these observations are just based on a superficial
glance at the code. Please correct me if I'm wrong.)

Edi.