Re: Fw: Reddit: Let's rewrite a better one in Common Lisp.
Brian Mastenbrook <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Dec 2005 18:45:05 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.web |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Dec 6, 2005, at 1:42 PM, Marc Battyani wrote: > [I've just posted this in comp.lang.lisp but it should be of > interest here > too ;-)] > > That would be much more fun than whining. ;-) > > So let's rewrite a better one. By better one I mean adding new > functionalities like categories and/or comments on links for instance. > > Let's set the rules: > > Rule 1: Anything is OK as long as it's in Common Lisp. > Rule 2: An exception to rule 1 is accepted for stuff like the OS > (Linux, > MacOS, etc.), Database (PostgreSQL, MySQL), Webservers (Apache), etc. > > After all there are more than enough Lisp web frameworks around > (TBNL, UCW, > AServe, CL-HTTP, Araneida, etc. ;-) Is this really that interesting of a site and project? From what I saw, it isn't anything that I would point to as an example of "this is what you can do in Common Lisp". It looks just like what everybody else is doing in Ruby, Python, etc. Isn't there something we can point to and say *this* is what you use Common Lisp for? -- Brian Mastenbrook [email protected] http://brian.mastenbrook.net/