Re: Araneida basic versus digest authentication

On Friday 24 March 2006 11:07, Kamen TOMOV wrote:
> The Digest auth is considered secure as the credentials are not send. 

Be aware that a naive implementation can be vulnerable to replay attacks and 
that there are a number of security issues not addressed by digest 
authentication (RFC2617, section 4).  When Kamen says it's considered secure, 
I'm sure he doesn't mean to imply that it's considered secure. :-)

> An additional security can be
> achieved by providing encryption on the transport layer (SSL).

Indeed, SSL provides *substantially* greater security.  And once you've gone 
with HTTPS, there's rarely if ever any reason to bother with digest over 
basic authentication.

Donavon Keithley