Re: Porting digested new list archives to mail-archive

Shahrukh Merchant <shahrukh-JBnn932roWprxK55Bk0MR1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:21:28 -0300
Newsgroups gmane.mail.archives.mail-archive
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> 1. Yes, we override list name on import.

OK, so they are threaded and paginated independently of what's in the 
"To:" line.

> 2. Search will have no concept of alternative list names. There is no
> reasonable way to overcome this.

Hmm, I don't understand this, given your answer to (1) above. If the 
primary list name is [email protected], then by your convention, it seems 
that going to www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ would bring up the 
"home page" for that list archive. There is no way to restrict a search 
just to "pages under this page"? I.e., that the only way to get a 
particular list is to match explicitly the contents of the "To:" field 
for that list?

> 3. Why not use the tool that Earl mentioned?

Because it seems with nmh I would have to do it manually on a digest by 
digest basis. So with hundreds of digests and thousands of created 
individual files which I would then need to remerge, I really need a 
script that processes an mbox of hundreds of Digests in one fell swoop, 
creating a slightly smaller compliant mbox of all the individual emails, 
which is the script that I have just finished writing. Besides, if I 
have to do additional processing, e.g., to replace old To: lines with 
the new list name to avoid the search problem, I need a script anyway 
(albeit a simpler one). (I'll make this script available once I'm done, 
so it will have been completely debugged and well tested, since it may 
be useful to others in the future.)

> 4. We always merge into the new list name and set up an HTTP redirect so
> that the old URLs are not broken. Merges are done via a manual request
> to support staff.

OK, that's clear. But then it would have the same search issue, would it 
not? I.e., that while the merged list would appear as one in the summary 
and threads pages, a searcher would have to search for one or the other 
(or use an OR operator in the search, which seems like another way to 
overcome this, i.e., create a search with a hidden field containing the 
OR of all variants).

Shahrukh