Re: Dilemma -- to re-release 3.2.2 or release 3.2.3?

> Last night, I posted the files for version 3.2.2 to fix some issues 
> reported by Thomas in Germany.  The tests I ran worked just fine.
>
> Today, however, I looked more closely at log files and found that AT&T 
> SMTP software violates RFC 6152.  Specifically, it responds with “250-8 
> BITMIME” instead of “250-8BITMIME”.  Note that the server’s response has a 
> space character between ‘8’ and “BITMIME”, contrary to RFC 6152.
>
> What I did today was to change the source to accept “250-8 BITMIME” as if 
> it were “250-8BITMIME”.  I also made a small change to output UTF-7 codes 
> instead of UTF-8 if the server does not indicate “250-BINARYMIME” or 
> “250-8BITMIME”.
>
> So, here’s the question to the group – do I re-release version 3.2.2 with 
> this small change, or do I release version 3.2.3?


What I can do to make version 3.2.3 a little more appealing is to 
include -logcmds option.  I was holding that new option for version 3.3.0 
when I give Blat multithread support for SMTP as well as NNTP.

-- 
Chip