Re: included-gsl patch
Matthias Andree <[email protected]> Tue, 06 Sep 2005 10:29:18 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.bogofilter.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Torsten Veller <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > > attached is a patch for included-gsl check. I think it is correct. > > --with-included-gsl --> need_my_gsl=2 > --wihout-included-gsl or none --> need_my_gsl=1 > > It uses the included gsl if requested and > checks if the libs are installed, if either > --without or nothing is passed to configure. > If they don't exist, the included lib is used. > > > BTW: my gcc (4.0.1) thinks it should point out: > note: obsolete option -I- used, please use -iquote instead Quite disturbing, as it encourages replacing one construct by one that is even less portable. Please report a regression bug to GCC. > --- configure.ac~ 2005-09-06 01:52:58.000000000 +0200 > +++ configure.ac 2005-09-06 01:53:13.000000000 +0200 > @@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ > > need_my_gsl=1 > AC_ARG_WITH(included-gsl, AC_HELP_STRING([--with-included-gsl],[force use of shipped GSL rather than system GSL]), > -if test "x$WITHVAL" != "xyes" ; then need_my_gsl=2 ; fi) > +if test "x$withval" = "xyes" ; then need_my_gsl=2 ; fi) > > if test "$need_my_gsl" = 1 ; then > AM_PATH_GSL(1.4, I see this has been merged. Thanks a lot for your patch. -- Matthias Andree _______________________________________________ Bogofilter-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter-dev