make rpm
David Relson <[email protected]> Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:28:52 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.bogofilter.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Osage Software Systems, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Matthias, I've been thinking about the names of our binary rpms. At present we have: bogofilter-x.y.z-1.i586.rpm - the DB4.2 shared library rpm bogofilter-static-x.y.z-1.i586.rpm - the DB4.2 static linked rpm recent changes add: bogofilter-sqlite-x.y.z-1.i586.rpm - SQLite3 rpm I think it would be appropriate to include database version as part of the binary rpm name, i.e. bogofilter-db42... bogofilter-sqlite... bogofilter-db42-static... bogofilter-sqlite-static... A question for you (and the other subscribers to the list) is whether this is a good naming convention and whether we want/need all these rpms? Also, in Makefile.am there's an objdump test? On my workstation it's triggering the "Please run ..." message. I've checked and my build of sqlite-3.2.8 _does_ include symbol __ctype_b_loc. Regards, David _______________________________________________ Bogofilter-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter-dev