Re: rpms
Matthias Andree <[email protected]> Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:14:56 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.bogofilter.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
David Relson <[email protected]> writes: > About 8% of the downloads from SourceForge are the src.rpm file. > Admittedly we could drop that and all the binary rpms, but I see no > need to do that. > > Determining what rpmbuild wants in the spec file (for building > different binary rpms) is more trouble, especially since rpmbuild's > behavior seem to depend on its version. I am not suggesting to discontinue the binary RPMs! I suggest that we stop rolling the source RPM in a future bogofilter 1.1.0 version, since there is no practical difference between the .tar.gz and the .src.rpm packages. One uses rpmbuild -tb, the other rpmbuild --rebuild, and both take/need all the --defines and environment variables you may need to tune the build. We should build the .src.rpm for 1.0.1 for compatibility. And perhaps for future versions, too. -- Matthias Andree _______________________________________________ Bogofilter-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter-dev