Re: Idea for improving the learning stage
Andrew <[email protected]> Fri, 7 Sep 2007 22:57:49 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.bogofilter.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 23:53:06 +0200, mouss <[email protected]> wrote: > [body only] > Isn't "Subject" a token and that removing it will make it no more > neutral? I mean, suppose you remove Subject from thousand spam messages, > then "Subject" may become a ham sign, which it should not be. Good point, provided that Bogofilter actually treats "Subject:" as any other word. If that's the case, we should pass a line that only says "Subject:". > [subject only] > and if you only train by subject, you will miss the spammy body tokens. But you'll also ignore possible "polluting" words in the body, while taking note of those words (the subject) that really prompted the user to flag the message as spam. Regards, Andrew _______________________________________________ Bogofilter-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter-dev