Re: DB backend support for lmdb?
Steffen Nurpmeso <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Jul 2018 21:30:41 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.bogofilter.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20180719193041.33VX0%[email protected]> |
Hello. Matthias Andree wrote in <[email protected]>: |Am 18.07.2018 um 01:19 schrieb Matthias Andree: |> Before doing further development, please switch to |> ^/branches/lmdb-support and/or update. I'm heading for bed now that |> r7064 has been committed. | |...make that r7065. All tests pass for me now. - I had a failure still in db_foreach(), which caused t.encoding to fail. (That was a leftover from the first implementation idea, which toggled in between "master" and "txn".) - I have given up setting an initial size unless that is for the fixed-size implementation, but which is not the default. - I have not yet catched the "other process caused resize" error (again), now we do that. - In order to comply with bogofilter's "newly-created" paradigm we now use two named databases, one for the data, the other's use is just to be existent, or not, used as the indicator. I hope this is satisfying. I will attach the entire new source. Ciao! And thanks for bogofilter. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) _______________________________________________ bogofilter-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter-dev