Re: Result Based on a Single Token
John G Walker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.bogofilter.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:35:07 +0100 RW <[email protected]> wrote: > The reason why this particular mail was detected as spam is that I > don't train on all unsure result in mailing lists. That's your problem, then. > The reason I don't learn all unsure mails in mailing lists is that > mailing lists are one of the few cases where spammers have access to > high-quality ham text, and I'm concerned that one day they may > exploit that. Consequently I don't like to let lists dominate my ham > corpus. If you try to pick and choose which observations go into a Bayesian (or, indeed, classical statistics) database then you get screwy results. That's the nature of statistics. You have to throw in everything or it doesn't work. Period. As you've discovered, -- All the best, John _______________________________________________ Bogofilter mailing list [email protected] http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter