Re: Training frustration
Pavel Kankovsky <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.bogofilter.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Anne Wilson wrote: > You seem surprised that I was cleaning out the 'trained' messages. I > thought it was a bad idea to keep running the same messages through the > training. Am I wrong? It depends. Look for "training to exhaustion". I myself don't do it. My spam corpus is so huge that I can always find multiple independent copies of even the most difficult and exotic spam. :) > I'll keep the -c parameter in the command in future. What is the reason for > it not being the default? I am not the author of trainbogo.sh. I guess the idea was to make it possible to do several passes through the corpus in order to catch cases when the classification of a message changes (from correct to incorrect) after some other messages has been trained. --Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ] "Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for assimilation." _______________________________________________ Bogofilter mailing list [email protected] http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter