Re: SA vs BF
".rp" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.bogofilter.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On Sat, 10 May 2008, Sven Hoexter wrote: > > > To be fair I've been told that SA is a lot better these days then in the > > beginning and it can be integrated into a full fledged amavisd-new setup > > without a lot of hassle. I guss it still requires some tuning now and then > > which I don't need with bogofilter. > > How about SpamAssassin's Bayes speed? It used to be awkwardly slow... > I don't use SA's Bayes at all. our setup is that clamav-milter, SA and BF are run on the RH sendmail server. If it gets through the virus check, hack attempt, phishing and SA then BF is given a shot at it _______________________________________________ Bogofilter mailing list [email protected] http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter