Re: re-training with -Ns and -Sn

Bill McClain <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.bogofilter.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008 18:27:45 +0100 (BST)
"Bjorn Graabek" <[email protected]> wrote:

>            I have realised that my bogofilter setup may not be quite
> right, am I doing something really awful here?
> 
>  I use tri-state classification which, according to the man page, means
> that any emails classified as unsure are not used to train bogofilter (I
> use -u on all email). I move incorrectly classified emails into a "mark as
> bad", "mark as good" folder and I then run bogofilter with "bogofilter
> -Ns" and "bogofilter -Sn". That is fine with emails that were incorrectly
> classified, but what about those emails classified as "unsure"? As they
> weren't registered in the first place, they shouldn't be unregistered
> before they are correctly registered?

I don't unregister Unsure emails for that reason. But unless you have a huge
number of such, I don't think unregistering then will do much harm. It just
bumps the spam/ham counts one way or the other.

-Bill
-- 
Sattre Press                              History of Astronomy 
http://sattre-press.com/               During the 19th Century
[email protected]                       by Agnes M. Clerke
                              http://sattre-press.com/han.html
_______________________________________________
Bogofilter mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.