Re: Bogofilter accuracy plummets starting around March 10, 2010
David Relson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.bogofilter.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Osage Software Systems, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 04:23:47 +0400 Dmitry wrote: > David Relson wrote: > > "Invisible headers" is not a term I recognize. > > Headers like "To, cc, from, subject, date" -- are visible in almost > all MUA. Everything else is usually invisible. When you allow > bogofilter to process any invisible headers you pollute the database > with random data and make spam detection innacurate. Real spammer has > 2 way to break spam filter: 1. To make headers the same way as known > mail user agents do; or 2) to make random headers in each message. > So, in any case it makes more harm than good from the viewpoint of > spam detection. > > 1) You allow random data > > > pipe your message through an appropriate "egrep -v > > "^(this|or|that):" command. > > To send millions messages through pipe with egrep? No, thanks. It is > unnecessary load on the server. Dmitry, Bogofilter recognizes a number of headers (to, from, return-path, etc) and creates special symbols. This gives them special significance. Other header tokens don't get the same treatment, hence are treated similarly to tokens in the body. I don't perceive that bogofilter has a problem. It does well for the thousands of spam arrriving daily at my domain. Adding millions of header tokens is no different from adding millions of body tokens, as far as I can tell. If you want bogofilter to provide special handling for other special tokens, the source code is available and you can customize to your heart's content. Regards, David _______________________________________________ Bogofilter mailing list [email protected] http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter