Re: still problem in spam management
Stéphane Guedon <[email protected]> Wed, 6 Apr 2011 09:41:56 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.bogofilter.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | http://www.22decembre.eu |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 06 April 2011 01:17:56 RW wrote: > On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 17:40:01 +0100 > > Stéphane Guedon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi everyone > > > > I use bogfilter since months now, and I still have a problem of > > classification between ham and spam. > > Half of my spam is still classified as ham. > > > > Description of the system : > > My bogofilter work on my mail server, the mail is delivered by > > postfix, bogofilter read it, rank it, mark it as spam or not > > ( ___SPAM___ in header) and make auto-update, and give it to postix > > again. Postfix give it to dovecot deliver which set it in the > > Sounds like you are doing two-way classification and autolearning > everything. > > > corresponding box on imap. If marked as spam, they go in INBOX.spam... > > > > After that, if I receive spam in my normal boxes, I put it in the > > spam box. > > > > End of process : each day, a script read the messages in INBOX.spam > > and learn those without ___SPAM___ (so, the mistaken) to be real > > spam. The contrary to the rare ham that were in the spam box. > > If you autolearned during classification you need to unlearn before > relearning. Are you doing that? I do that : If in spam but without "___SPAM___" I tell it's really a spam... grep -L "___SPAM___" * | bogofilter -Ns -d /var/lib/bogofilter contrary on the ham boxes : grep -l "___SPAM___" * | bogofilter -Sn -d /var/lib/bogofilter The scripts are not mine, but sounds good ! Remarks ? > > > This script also run bogoutil -l wordlist.db and such things after > > having corrected the mistakes ... > > > > Unless all this sophisticated process, half of my spam has still a > > bogofilter score of around 0.42, close to be considered really as > > spam, but not crossing the border ! > > Bogofilter produces results that cluster three-ways around 0.0, 0.5. > and 1.0, representing ham, unsure and spam. In my experience it's > unusual to get spam below 0.49. I suspect that your wordlist is > mistrained. -- Stéphane Guedon page web : http://www.22decembre.eu/ carte de visite : http://www.22decembre.eu/downloads/Stephane-Guedon.vcf clé publique gpg : http://www.22decembre.eu/downloads/Stephane-Guedon.asc _______________________________________________ Bogofilter mailing list [email protected] http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 316 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAAECAAYFAk2cGUQACgkQPJH+in8bwINacwP/TtS36C2gXaa15jbb9SQlvDQO 28XCDVTPlrxzIXcLiul8BDuIhNWCTt5ki8XKdUTk+s7Yy8Ml+n1mwplzX+rcIgj3 pLPxmyXOl+T+5eEUlex7LY+6xKaJpvNVoiTVBJSrPv8h8OTxqYuqF15eNcFVxhjU 0/eF9//T33ZDPPvhi/E= =2diw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----