Re: can't train bogofilter
David Relson <[email protected]> Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:01:45 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.bogofilter.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Osage Software Systems, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <20120610190145.7545e879@osage> |
Renato, I don't think updating headers fits with training. Training is an action whose purpose is to update the wordlist. The X-Bogosity header is added when scoring a message. Scoring and updating are separate and distinct operations. Regards, David On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:07:22 +0200 renato wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 07:57:41 -0400 > David Relson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello Renato, > > > > There are several problems with what you're doing. > > Hi David and RW, thanks for your clarifications, it's all clearer now. > > Regarding the header, wouldn't it be more natural for bogofilter to > change it when I explicitly tell him a certain message is Ham or Spam? > That way when I for example do a -Ns on a false-ham mail, I can then > move it to the spam folder and be *sure* that all mails in the spam > folder have a X-Bogosity: Spam... that certainty could be useful: one > could for example mess up something and end with all messages in the > spam folder, he could then easily distinguish, by looking at the > X-Bogosity header, mails that bogofilter has never parsed, or has > classified as Ham or Spam. > > Not sure if it really makes sense, it's just an idea. > > cheers, > renato _______________________________________________ Bogofilter mailing list [email protected] http://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter