Re: Converting old wordlist.db to Berkeley format?
RW <[email protected]> Mon, 5 Sep 2016 19:15:55 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.bogofilter.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 10:58:34 +0100 Geoff wrote: > It would be tedious, but if need be I could also retrain. As soon as > I understood (back in 2003), that training could be a slow process, I > began to archive my spam in case I needed to start again. (I already > archived everthing else for purposes of my profession). I have about > 93K spam mails, and rather more ham, archived. IIWY I'd train a new wordlist on 2000 recent spams and 2000 recent hams and then run trainbogo.sh on the larger corpus with something like: ham_cutoff = 0.001 spam_cutoff= 0.99 trainbogo.sh does a train-on-error pass through the corpus, which is much faster than training on everything. Old, very heavily trained wordlists are not always optimal. They may contain a lot of training that's no longer relevant, and they can become over-trained and resistant to change. _______________________________________________ bogofilter mailing list [email protected] https://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter