Re: Database Size versus Shannon's Word Entropy
Rick van Rein <[email protected]> Tue, 24 Oct 2017 22:59:20 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.bogofilter.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, > Bogoutil also allows the user to filter out seen-only-once tokens > (lower-case -c option -- by age, see the -a option). Thanks for pointing that out! > Not sure if it > really matters much: 44 MB seems small enough these days (it sure wasn't > when I built my first Linux PC on DX4 basis in the late 1990s). I started on a ZX Spectrum and have always thought 48 kB was a whole lot :) But my reason for wondering about database size is that I am also thinking about splitten them over users, such as a separate spam filter for aliases like [email protected] that cover an area of interest for the mail user. Or IMAP subfolders. Bogofilter is likely to be useful to sort email into the right alias and/or IMAP sub-folder (including ones for Spam and Unsure). But that would not allow for the light-weight alias [0] support that we're after for our IdentityHub project [1]. That got me thinking / playing about the database size. I did notice that the number of cases is a #define now set to 2, so a more practical approach to this alias sorting idea could be to simply have larger records with counters for each alias. [But that would make it a -dev discussion I suppose.] Thanks, -Rick [0] http://internetwide.org/blog/2015/04/23/id-3-idforms.html [1] http://internetwide.org/blog/2016/06/24/iwo-phases.html _______________________________________________ bogofilter mailing list [email protected] https://www.bogofilter.org/mailman/listinfo/bogofilter