Re: Temporarily blocked...not

> On 27 Oct 2016, at 23:20, Technical Support <[email protected]> =
wrote:
>=20
> Hello,
>=20
> On 2016-10-27 21:56 , Tom Rymes wrote:
>> On 10/27/2016 12:27 PM, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
>>=20
>>> Couldn=E2=80=99t one instead argue that mailing lists are =
=E2=80=9Dbroken=E2=80=9D in this
>>> regard? :) I don=E2=80=99t think DMARC and SPF are going anywhere =
but instead
>>> becoming more popular.
>>=20
>> I did see the smiley, but seeing as mailing lists pre-date DMARC and =
SPF
>> by decades, I'm going to go with DMARC is broken for not taking this
>> long-standing and widely used technology into account as part of its
>> design.
>>=20
>> Of course, those developing DMARC and SPF have a built-in business
>> reasons for trying to make mailing lists fade into history, so that
>> might play a part in it?
>>=20
>> Tom
>=20
> CGPro mailing lists in general and this one in particular can be =
configured to set the =46rom address in list posting to the list address =
(rather than poster's) but preserve the display name part of the =
address. If there is no further reasoning against this then we probably =
turn this feature on for this list. Objections?

Any downsides?

This is interesting because I run a few lists myself. Which setting are =
we talking about, specifically?


#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[email protected]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[email protected]=
om>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[email protected]>
Send administrative queries to  <[email protected]>