Re: SpamAssassin 2.50 & SA-Exim 2.2 ==> problem ...

Lawrence Walton <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin
Message-ID <[email protected]>
W. E. Brooks [[email protected]] wrote:
> I was able to move from SpamAssassin 2.43 to SpamAssassin 2.50 on a
> system running Exim 4.12 and SA-Exim 2.2 without any problems. I did not
> change the "report_safe" option from it's default value.
> 
> I also saw the note in the README for SpamAssassin 2.50 regarding the
> change in "default tagging behavior". It caused me some concern.
> However, I have not noticed any problems after upgrading to SpamAssassin
> 2.50.
> 
> -- 
> W. E. Brooks <[email protected]>
> 
I had some strange messeges, after the upgrade
SMTP protocol violation: synchronization error (next input sent too soon): rejected "HELO jwnqxho" H=[200.68.155.53]
I restarted with this "report_safe 0" and everything seems to work very well.
I'm _VERY_ interested to see if Bayesian spam analysis, works.

-- 
*--* Mail: [email protected]
*--* Voice: 425.739.4247
*--* Fax: 425.827.9577
*--* HTTP://the-penguin.otak.com/~lawrence/
--------------------------------------
- - - - - - O t a k  i n c . - - - - -
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.