Re: undefined vars in Greylisting.pm

"Mike Pellatt" <[email protected]> Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:12:25 +0000

Newsgroups	gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin
Message-ID	<"L8E18AB88551C44dcB90611C57425A1C5.1170951131.scalix1.ppmi-consultants.co.uk*"@MHS>

RE: [SA-exim] undefined vars in Greylisting.pm (text/plain, 844 B)

 
On 08 February 2007 15:12, Marc MERLIN [mailto:[email protected]] wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:25:03AM +0100, Andreas Vögele wrote:
> > > I still don't get how SA-Exim can ever be the right tool for the 
job 
> > > as far as fetchmail is concerned. It can be made to work, but I'm 
> > > not sure why? :)
> > 
> > It doesn't make sense to use SA-Exim if fetchmail is the only means 
of 
> > retrieving mail.  But if you would like to greylist SMTP connections 

> > and also have to use fetchmail SA-Exim is a good choice.
> 
> That's true. And you must be the only person who does this :)

<waves>

No, he isn't :-)

I'm soooo impressed with SA-Exim, it really has revolutionised our mail 
handling.

I played with MailScanner years ago. Then I realised I wasn't being a 
good netizen......

Exim, of course, is the One True MTA.

Mike