Re: SA-Exim Header Question
Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1048241030.25647.77.camel@localhost> |
tor, 2003-03-20 kl. 22:03 skrev Patrice Fournier: > > Could someone please explain what the best way to prevent spammers from > > fooling sa-exim with forged X-SA-Do-No headers is? And also dispel any > > misconceptions I have about how any of the above mechanisms work? > > I believe the new Exim 4.14 $acl_m? variables would be perfect here (I've > not yet looked at how they work so I can't confirm this yet) Now that you made me start to think at all and RTFM a bit (which always helps), I could imagine an SA regex meta for local.cf which ought to be able to cope with this, too, in combination with existing ACLs. Best, Tony -- Tony Earnshaw e-post: [email protected] www: http://www.billy.demon.nl