Re: Postmaster question
Dominic Hargreaves <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 10:48:50AM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > SA-Exim by default lets all mail, including spam, to postmaster@mydomain > through. I reject all spam above 7.0 at smtp time with an smtp 550. > However, I send a polite note with it that mail to postmaster will be > accepted, if we've made a mistake. The result is, that the spammer > (where he has a real address and sees this) sends his spam to postmaster > :-/ Do you provide the full e-mail address of postmaster, or just the local-part (to be qualified by the sender with an ounce of clue)? I can believe that spammers automatically scan bounces for valid e-mail addresses, but not that they'd read them manually, in which case just providing the local part (ie: "please e-mail postmaster at this domain if this is a mistake") should have the desired effect. > So, I want postmaster's mail scanned and rejected too, if it's spam. the > rfc282* says this would be wrong of me. What do you think? I'd avoid it if possible, but if you have to maybe think about putting a higher threshold on for it? Cheers, Dom.