RE: FW: best way to patch
Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1053120424.3479.57.camel@localhost> |
fre, 16.05.2003 kl. 11.08 skrev Thomas Kinghorn: > ran make -dl as explained: > got this That's not what was being explained. The whole SA-Exim thing presupposes you have a common install directory with exim-4.14, sa-exim-3.0 and exim-4.20 next to each other. The sa-exim-3.0 Makefile has a mistake in line 22: "EXIM_SRC= ../exim-4.14/src". If you never installed or patched exim-4.14 and only began with 4.20, this will give a compile error - since it's pointing at a directory that doesn't exist and was never patched. Edit Makefile and change line 22 to read: "EXIM_SRC= ../exim-4.20/src" Then edit exim-4.20/Local/Makefile: Find "LOOKUP_LIBS". add -ldl to the end of that line. If it's commented out in the first place, uncomment it. Actually, it implies '-L/usr/lib -ldl', but you shouldn't need the /usr/lib bit, since make will always look in /usr/lib for libs. Then change back to ../sa-exim-3.0 and do 'make'. Nothing else, just 'make. See what happens. Best, Tony > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc MERLIN [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 16 May 2003 09:01 > To: Thomas Kinghorn > Cc: Sa-Exim@Lists. Merlins. Org (E-mail) > Subject: Re: [SA-exim] FW: best way to patch > > > On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 08:56:36AM +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote: > > Okay, I have patched the file, copied the new EDITME > > to Local/Makefile and run a 'make' > > > > this is what I am getting. > > Add a -dl, as explained right here a few days ago -- Tony Earnshaw <[email protected]>