Re: Which version(s) of spamassassin?

Den 7 Maj 2003 klockan 02:15 skrev Tony Earnshaw följande:
> However, what you are quoting in INSTALL, is simply verbatim from the SA
> 'man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf', which detail how to maintain the 2.40
> header spam reporting style, from which 2.50 differs.
> 
> This has nothing to do with SA-Exim - whether 2.2 or 3.0 - it's purely a
> SpamAssassin affair.

Yes, it doesn't matter if you run sa-exim 2.2 or 3.0.
report_safe > 0 won't work with either version, but it is a sa-exim
affair...
...take a close look at this:

<snip>
Subject: Re: Low Interest Rates for Homes  ejnehyy
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=10.4 required=5.0
        tests=BAD_CREDIT,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,
              LOW_INTEREST,MISSING_MIMEOLE,MORTGAGE_BEST,MORTGAGE_PITCH,
              RCVD_IN_NJABL,RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL
        version=2.54
X-Spam-Level: **********
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.54 (1.174.2.17-2003-05-11-exp)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_3ECA940E.E34C99ED"
X-SA-Exim-Version: 3.0 (built Mon May  5 22:52:02 CEST 2003)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--880C.1CA8A8E.EB_
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

FREE MORTGAGE QUOTE & BEST POSSIBLE RATES !
</snap>

SA (2.54 w/ report_safe=1) adds the 'Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----------=_3ECA940E.E34C99ED"'-header but as I see it sa-exim
doesn't make use of the mail-body spamc returns but sticks with the
original body and the boundary (SA added) is never found by the MUA and
thus the mail won't show up at all.

/Richard