Re: SA-scan compared to exiscan
Marc MERLIN <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:56:37AM +0200, Tom Kistner wrote:
> Marc MERLIN wrote:
>
> >[Ccing Tom, exiscan author, so that he can correct me if needed]
BTW, I added you in the 'can post' list so the list shouldn't send you a
warning were you to post again.
> No corrections necessary :) I have added the antispam facility to
> exiscan since most people want to do both av and antispam. However, my
> goal is always to keep the configuration as simple as possible and the
> impact on the SMTP protocol as low as possible, so exiscan does not
> support as many options as sa-exim and I will also not go into things
> like tarpitting.
That makes sense, thanks for the info.
> >I thought exiscan 4 went in local_scan, but that Tom gave you the option
> >to daisy chain sa-exim?
>
> Yes. I moved exiscan out of local_scan completely, so you can use any
> other local_scan plugin in conjunction with exiscan. It is no problem to
> use both exiscan and sa-exim together, and I would recommend it to those
> who need a more sophisticated antispam configuration. :)
Cool, thanks.
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems & security ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger [email protected] for PGP key