RE: sa-exim and whiltelists
Nick <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <86F3AD6D5B0BD511850900B0D0B041AE6586A5@3TPRO> |
Similarly, I'd also like to not scan a message if the following conditions are net: 1)There is only one recipient or all recipients are of the same domain and 2)That domain or address is listed in an exclusion table/file. feasible? > -----Original Message----- > From: Nick [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 4:21 PM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: [SA-exim] sa-exim and whiltelists > > > I've read through the archives regarding user based preferences and > understand the arguments against it. I've also seen the > various sorcery one > could use to make it work by using Tom Kistner's strategy. > My question is > slightly different since I'm only interested in whitelists. > What I'd like > to do is one of two things. Either not scan a message if ANY of the > recipients have whitelisted the sender, or, adjust the score > so that it > would not be considered spam. The whitelists would be stored > in a mysql > database. I found a post in the spamassassin-talk archive > (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talk&m=105567290 > 926230&w=2)tha > t states that this could be done using the exclusion rule. > What are your > thoughts on the best way to do this? > > Thanks, > > Nick > > _______________________________________________ > SA-Exim mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.merlins.org/lists/listinfo/sa-exim >