RE: sa-exim and whiltelists

Nick <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin
Message-ID <86F3AD6D5B0BD511850900B0D0B041AE6586A5@3TPRO>
Similarly, I'd also like to not scan a message if the following conditions
are net:
1)There is only one recipient or all recipients are of the same domain 
and
2)That domain or address is listed in an exclusion table/file.

feasible?



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 4:21 PM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: [SA-exim] sa-exim and whiltelists
> 
> 
> I've read through the archives regarding user based preferences and
> understand the arguments against it.  I've also seen the 
> various sorcery one
> could use to make it work by using Tom Kistner's strategy.  
> My question is
> slightly different since I'm only interested in whitelists.  
> What I'd like
> to do is one of two things.  Either not scan a message if ANY of the
> recipients have whitelisted the sender, or, adjust the score 
> so that it
> would not be considered spam.  The whitelists would be stored 
> in a mysql
> database.  I found a post in the spamassassin-talk archive
> (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talk&m=105567290
> 926230&w=2)tha
> t states that this could be done using the exclusion rule.  
> What are your
> thoughts on the best way to do this?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nick
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SA-Exim mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.merlins.org/lists/listinfo/sa-exim
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.