RE: sa-exim and whiltelists

Nick <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin
Message-ID <86F3AD6D5B0BD511850900B0D0B041AE6586A6@3TPRO>
Thanks Marc,

Your help (and software) is greatly appreciated.


--Nick
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc MERLIN [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 4:40 PM
> To: Nick
> Cc: '[email protected]'
> Subject: Re: [SA-exim] sa-exim and whiltelists
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 04:20:34PM -0600, Nick wrote:
> > I've read through the archives regarding user based preferences and
> > understand the arguments against it.  I've also seen the 
> various sorcery one
> > could use to make it work by using Tom Kistner's strategy.  
> My question is
> > slightly different since I'm only interested in whitelists. 
>  What I'd like
> > to do is one of two things.  Either not scan a message if ANY of the
> > recipients have whitelisted the sender, or, 
> 
> That can be done in SAEximRunCond or SAEximRejCond.
> 
> > adjust the score so that it would not be considered spam.  
> The whitelists
> 
> You can have exim add a header with warn on any condition and 
> write an SA
> rule that removes/add points depending on the header
> 
> Marc
> -- 
> "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to 
> type in" - A.S.R.
> Microsoft is to operating systems & security ....
>                                       .... what McDonalds is 
> to gourmet cooking
> Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/   |   Finger 
> [email protected] for PGP key
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.