RE: sa-exim and whiltelists
Nick <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <86F3AD6D5B0BD511850900B0D0B041AE6586A6@3TPRO> |
Thanks Marc, Your help (and software) is greatly appreciated. --Nick > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc MERLIN [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 4:40 PM > To: Nick > Cc: '[email protected]' > Subject: Re: [SA-exim] sa-exim and whiltelists > > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 04:20:34PM -0600, Nick wrote: > > I've read through the archives regarding user based preferences and > > understand the arguments against it. I've also seen the > various sorcery one > > could use to make it work by using Tom Kistner's strategy. > My question is > > slightly different since I'm only interested in whitelists. > What I'd like > > to do is one of two things. Either not scan a message if ANY of the > > recipients have whitelisted the sender, or, > > That can be done in SAEximRunCond or SAEximRejCond. > > > adjust the score so that it would not be considered spam. > The whitelists > > You can have exim add a header with warn on any condition and > write an SA > rule that removes/add points depending on the header > > Marc > -- > "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to > type in" - A.S.R. > Microsoft is to operating systems & security .... > .... what McDonalds is > to gourmet cooking > Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger > [email protected] for PGP key >