Re: Overwriting local_scan.c to buildy
Marilyn Davis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.10.10306251717180.9999-100000@rosa> |
Hi, Thank you! On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Marc MERLIN wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:44:51PM -0700, Marilyn Davis wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am choosing to compile the sa-exim code into exim by overwriting > > src/local_scan.c with sa-exim.c. Is this still ok? > > Yes, although the install is not very polished anymore > > > The INSTALL says "1) Unpack exim 4.11 or better, and overwrite > > src/local_scan.c with sa-exim-x.y.c. Rebuild exim, and you're done." > > > > sa-exim-x.y.c? I figured you mean sa-exim.c? So I tried that. > > Right. > > > But I get a compiler complaint because it can't find sa-exim.h, which > > is #included in sa-exim.c. I can't find an sa-exim.h in the > > sa-exim-3.0 distribution. > > You need to type make sa-exim.h, it'll generate the file and then you need > to copy it in the exim tree. Yep! It's totally working now. Very cool. > > Yeah, I need to fix the docs, sorry. It's ok since you're right here to ask. :^) So install method 2 is "better"? Is this because it's simpler? Because you can do it without the exim source? Is there some advantage to having local_scan in its library? Is this what's happening? If those are too many questions, just ignore me. Thank so much again. Marilyn > > Marc > -- > "A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R. > Microsoft is to operating systems & security .... > .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking > Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger [email protected] for PGP key >