Side-effect involving mailing lists

Rick Moen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.exim.spamassassin
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I'll admit to being a bit lazy in this, so feel welcome to tell me "Read
Your Friendly exim4.conf File" or "Read the Friendly Pipermail Archive"
-- but this might at least be mildly entertaining.

I _love_ sa-exim's teergrubing -- even though there are some unintended
consequences with relayed mail in sundry forms (backup MX, mailing
lists).  

1.  The first couple of days after converting to sa-exim, I realised
I was tarpitting my main backup MX, Richard Couture's myrddin.imat.com: 
Richard clings to an old-school "all mail is sacred" admin philosophy,
was relaying large amounts of spam, and accordingly was getting 
"451 Please try again later" upon attempting redelivery.

When I realised this, I wrote Richard to thank him for years of generous
help and discontinued all backup MX service.  (Speculation:  The notion
of backup MXes will be collateral damage in the spam war:  Unless all your
MXes use the same antispam policy, they'll tend to sanction one another.)  

2.  Similarly, I've noticed my system teergrubing spam-permissive
mailing lists:

   Date: 16 Nov 2003 12:24:59 -0000
   From: [email protected] 
   To: [email protected]
   Subject: ezmlm warning

   Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
   [email protected] mailing list.

   Messages to you seem to have been bouncing. I've attached a copy of 
   the first bounce message I received.

   If this message bounces too, I will send you a probe. If the probe bounces,
   I will remove your address from the mailing list, without further notice.

   I've kept a list of which messages bounced from your address. Copies of
   these messages may be in the archive. To get message 12345 from the
   archive, send an empty note to [email protected].
   Here are the message numbers:

      7365

    --- Below this line is a copy of the bounce message I received.

   Return-Path: <>
   Received: (qmail 30581 invoked for bounce); 4 Nov 2003 17:58:16 -0000
   Date: 4 Nov 2003 17:58:15 -0000
   From: [email protected]
   To: [email protected]
   Subject: failure notice

   Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ns.crynwr.com.
   I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
   This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

   <[email protected]>:
   198.144.195.186 failed after I sent the message.
   Remote host said: 451 Please try again later
   I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long.


Anyone want to advise DJB of the distinction between SMTP rejects
and "bouncing"?  I'm not volunteering.  ;->

Just to confirm my strong suspicion, I asked EZMLM to send me post
#7365.  Indeed, it's classic 419 scam-spam.  

Separately, Yahoo Groups has put me on "nomail" several times for
"bouncing" [sic] its crappy mailing lists' relayed spam -- though that's
trivial to reverse.


What I'm curious about is:  What's a reasonable way to deal with this
problem?  I'm tempted to label the "problem" serendipitous, and conclude
that spam-permissive listadmins _should_ be teergrubed into oblivion,
but what do people do for spam-permissive mailing lists they want to
read, not get spam from, and not get thrown off on account of teergrubing
them?

-- 
Cheers,                             * Contributing Editor, Linux Gazette *
Rick Moen                       -*- See the Linux Gazette in its new home: -*-
[email protected]                       <http://linuxgazette.net/>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.